The Bright and the Tarnished Sides of Copper

Copper-based fungicide is effective, but it poses environmental risks.

Written by Ronald Lane, CEO Circadian Crop Sciences

Copper-based fungicides have been a cornerstone of agricultural disease management for well over a century. The first, Bordeaux mixture — a blend of copper sulfate and lime — was discovered in 1885 by French scientist Pierre-Marie Alexis Millardet. Initially used by grape growers in the Bordeaux region to deter birds and passersby from snacking on their fruit, it soon became evident that this mixture also protected vines from downy mildew. 

Since then, copper fungicides have remained a critical tool in plant disease control. Today, copper ranks as the third-most-used fungicide worldwide, following sulfur and petroleum-based oils. In California alone, farmers apply approximately 6 million pounds of copper fungicides each year, treating about 1.8 million acres of crops.

The Benefits of Copper Fungicides

Copper’s strength lies in its broad-spectrum effectiveness. It controls a wide array of fungal and bacterial diseases, including powdery mildew, anthracnose, peach leaf curl, brown rot, black rot and fire blight. Copper sprays work by releasing positively charged copper ions that compromise fungal cell membranes and disrupt enzymatic processes essential to fungal survival. As a contact fungicide, copper prevents rather than cures infections. 

Beyond disease control, copper also serves as an essential plant micronutrient, supporting chlorophyll production, seed formation and overall plant vigor. In soils where copper levels are deficient, foliar applications of copper fungicides can enhance crop growth. Additionally, copper fungicides are relatively low in toxicity to mammals and, when used in moderation, pose minimal risks to human health and the environment.

Given these advantages, copper fungicides are a valuable component of any grower’s pest management toolbox. However, as with any agricultural input, overuse comes with consequences.

The Environmental Costs of Copper Accumulation

While copper is an effective fungicide, excessive application leads to environmental concerns. The 6 million pounds of copper applied annually in California alone significantly impact soil health. Some crops receive over 20 pounds of elemental copper per acre per season — far more than plants need for growth.

What happens to all this copper? A portion remains on crops, potentially affecting post-harvest quality. In wine production, for instance, excessive copper residues can interfere with fermentation, disrupt yeast and bacterial activity, and alter the flavor and aging process of wine.

Most applied copper, however, ends up in the soil. Once there, it binds tightly to organic matter and clay, accumulating over time. Elevated copper levels can be toxic to earthworms, beneficial microbes and fungi that are essential for soil health, nutrient cycling and plant disease resistance. High copper concentrations can also interfere with plant uptake of other essential nutrients like iron, zinc and manganese, potentially leading to deficiencies and reduced crop yields. Symptoms of copper toxicity include stunted growth, chlorosis (leaf yellowing), necrosis (tissue death) and weakened root systems.

Copper is particularly problematic in sandy soils, where it can leach into groundwater or run off into surface water. Once in aquatic environments, copper is highly toxic to fish and invertebrates, posing risks to entire ecosystems. Just 1 gram of copper can contaminate 200 gallons of drinking water beyond the EPA’s permissible standard of 1.3 ppm. While copper is a necessary dietary element for humans, excessive exposure has been linked to gastrointestinal issues, liver damage, cognitive impairment, high blood pressure and other health concerns.

Managing Copper Levels in Soil

Farmers concerned about excessive copper levels should consider soil testing through a local lab. Natural background concentrations of copper in soil typically range from 2 to 50 ppm — more than sufficient for most crops. Levels between 50 to 100 ppm indicate slight elevation, while anything above 100 ppm poses potential toxicity risks. If copper exceeds 200 ppm, it becomes highly toxic to plants and soil organisms.

For fields with excessive copper, several remediation strategies exist.

Soil pH management. Raising soil pH to 6.5–7.5 reduces copper availability, but this can also lead to deficiencies in iron, manganese and boron.

Phytoremediation. Growing copper-accumulating plants like sunflowers, mustard, or barley can help extract copper, though biomass must be removed offsite — and it can take years to significantly reduce copper levels.

Soil removal. In extreme cases, heavily contaminated topsoil can be excavated and disposed of in a landfill, though this is neither practical nor sustainable.

Ultimately, the best approach is prevention — minimizing copper use before it becomes a problem.

The Future of Fungicide Use

Both organic and conventional farmers must take steps to curb copper accumulation. The European Union limits agricultural copper use to an average of 3.57 pounds/acre per year, a policy designed to slow accumulation while still allowing for disease management. However, for long-term sustainability, farmers need alternatives.

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) can help reduce pesticide use, but alternative fungicides are essential. Conventional farmers have numerous options, including synthetic fungicides like Pristine, which degrade in the soil within months. In contrast, copper remains indefinitely. Using organic-approved copper fungicides may be less sustainable than the use of many synthetic, non-natural, alternative fungicides.

Potassium sorbate (like All Phase)  has emerged as a promising alternative. Naturally found in mountain ash trees, potassium sorbate has a soil half-life of just 1 to 10 days and does not accumulate in the environment. Research from the University of California Davis found that potassium sorbate controlled peach leaf curl 39 percent more effectively than copper combined with petroleum-based oil. It has also shown strong efficacy against brown rot, powdery mildew, downy mildew and various bacterial and fungal pathogens.

Unlike copper, potassium sorbate leaves no pesticide residues, has no EPA reentry restrictions, and requires no pesticide-use reporting in California if formulated under minimum-risk pesticide standards. However, it is currently not approved for organic farming due to its synthetic manufacturing process, despite being chemically identical to its natural counterpart. In contrast, copper sulfate — a synthetic compound derived from sulfuric acid — is permitted in organic farming. This raises an important question: Shouldn’t sustainability be a higher priority than whether a compound is technically synthetic?

A Call for Smarter Organic Standards

The Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 allows certain synthetic substances, including copper fungicides. However, as scientific understanding evolves, so should organic farming standards. Farmers can petition the National Organic Program (NOP) (NOP.guidance@usda.gov) to reconsider potassium sorbate’s eligibility.

Sustainable agriculture means using the safest, most effective tools available. Whether farming conventionally or organically, reducing all pesticide applications (copper or otherwise) is key to long-term soil health and environmental stewardship. It’s time for organic and conventional growers alike to rethink copper reliance and embrace more sustainable alternatives for the future of farming.

Ronald Lane is the owner/operator of Circadian Crop Sciences, LLC. He is an inductee into the Gamma Sigma Delta Honor Society of Agriculture, a past Superintendent of Agriculture for the Environmental Horticulture and Plant Sciences departments at UC Davis, a former Vice President of the American Greenhouse Vegetable Growers Association, a former commercial greenhouse vegetable grower, and a California Licensed Pest Control Advisor.